PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 18 Jun 2020 04:38 PM by  DON GREENO
Classifying for the Gold Cube
 3 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Garrick Olsen
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Posts:2



--
14 Jun 2020 12:11 PM
    Hello,

    I’m a new prospector working in an area that primarily has small flakes. I’m usually working tailings piles or areas that have otherwise been processed by heavy equipment in some fashion, so not really expecting to find nuggets or larger pickers.

    My question is how far should I classify my concentrates prior to running them through the Gold Cube? Currently I run them through 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 wet. The smaller mesh gets me more material per bucket but I wonder if it’s worth the extra hassle and if I’m risking losing a small nugget. The 1/8+ material left on the screen is not easy to quickly sort through when I’m looking for nuggets before dumping (and I don’t have a detector). The smaller mesh also clogs up quicker. My material isn’t heavy clay but does have a lot of sand.

    I’m interested to hear what other’s experience has been with Cubing 1/4 vs 1/8 with respect to gold yields and time spent classifying. If I stopped at 1/4 I would double my material volume but buckets are cheap and running material through the Cube is much less work then using a screen.

    Thanks!
    Garrick Olsen
    Greenhorn
    Greenhorn
    Posts:2



    --
    16 Jun 2020 01:28 AM
    Turns out that 3/16 is the minimum you need to classify to in order to run through the gold cube according to multiple sources so I think I'll stick with 1/8 as it's the closest I have. I thought I had read you only had to classify to 1/4 but apparently not. That trommel is looking real handy...
    Tommy Patterson
    Greenhorn
    Greenhorn
    Posts:1



    --
    16 Jun 2020 03:15 PM
    i use the trammel on my cube and it classes it all to 1/8 and the booklet says 1/8 and under and 1000 lbs dry per-hour .. happy hunting
    DON GREENO
    Panner
    Panner
    Posts:41



    --
    18 Jun 2020 04:38 PM
    To add to the good info here already. I have exchanged my Vortex Matting in my Cube to Deep V on top, micro mat dream mat, Vortex, and last at the bottom is saw tooth mat. However i know for a fact that now that Dream mat has the Micro mini mat as well i will change out the Vortex mat in the 3d tray with micro mini dream mat. the reason why is you can accommodate a bit bigger material but you will most certainly increase the feed and the amount of material you can run through it but most importantly the recovery is second to none with the dream mat and micro mini dream mat.
    best to you
    You are not authorized to post a reply.